Knicks vs Pacers Match Player Stats and Performance Breakdown

Knicks vs Pacers Match Player Stats and Performance Breakdown

Lead: Knicks edge Pacers 114–113 on late three and crucial steal

On December 18, 2025, the New York Knicks secured a narrow 114–113 victory over the Indiana Pacers at Gainbridge Fieldhouse in Indianapolis. This outcome hinged on a clutch three-pointer by Jalen Brunson with 4.4 seconds remaining, followed by a game-sealing inbounds steal by OG Anunoby . The win extended the Knicks’ winning streak to seven games, delivering a dramatic finish and boosting their momentum in the regular season .

Context: Why this matchup matters now

This game marks the latest in the longstanding Knicks vs Pacers rivalry, a fixture stretching back to February 9, 1977, with the Knicks holding a slim edge overall (en.wikipedia.org). Coming off a solid start, the Knicks improved to 19–7, while the Pacers fell further behind at 6–21 . The closeness of the final score underlines that records aside, neither side is comfortably ahead when they meet.

Key Player Performances

Knicks: Brunson, Bridges and Kolek step up

• Jalen Brunson led New York with 25 points, adding 7 rebounds and 7 assists, and nailed the decisive three-pointer .
• OG Anunoby not only contributed the key steal, but his defensive presence remains a vital asset even though his box stats aren’t front and center in the summary.
• Mikal Bridges chipped in 22 points and 8 rebounds in a strong showing .
• Tyler Kolek delivered a breakout effort with 16 points (career-high), 11 assists (career-high), and 6 rebounds .

Pacers: Nembhard and Siakam carry the offense

• Andrew Nembhard exploded for 31 points, including a scorching 4 of 5 from three-point range, alongside 4 assists .
• Pascal Siakam added 26 points, along with 6 rebounds and 5 assists .

Team metrics snapshot

• Field goal percentages were nearly identical: Knicks shot 46.7%, Pacers 46.2% .
• Three-point shooting favored New York: 39.5% vs. 32.4% .
• Free throws tilted Indiana’s way (88.9% vs 57.9%), but New York capitalized late .
• Total rebounds were similar: Knicks 54, Pacers 56 .
• Knicks held a slight edge in turnovers (16 vs 14) and assists (31 vs 22) .

Behind the Stats: What Made the Difference

The Pacers nearly stole it behind Nembhard and Siakam’s firepower, and their free-throw accuracy kept them close down the stretch. Yet despite their strong performance, the Pacers couldn’t convert a narrow lead into victory.

On the Knicks’ side, Brunson’s ball handling and clutch scoring proved decisive. Bridges and Kolek provided muscle, while Anunoby’s defensive acumen made the difference in crunch time. The Knicks’ superior three-point efficiency and ball movement ultimately tilted the game in their favor.

Roster and Rivalry Trends in Focus

Beyond today’s result, season-long data spotlights different strengths:

• Knicks rank highly in offensive efficiency. They average 118.4 points per game, with an offensive rating of 121.1—both top-4 league marks .
• Pacers trend slightly lower: 116.0 PPG and offensive rating of 115.7, both decent but not elite .
• Head-to-head during 2024–25 saw standout individual efforts: Brunson (26.1 PPG), Towns (24.7), Bridges (17.7), Anunoby (16.4), and Hart (14.7) paced the Knicks; while the Pacers leaned on Siakam (20.7), Haliburton (17.8), Mathurin (16.6), Turner (15.1), and Nembhard (10.5) .

What Comes Next

The next chapter arrives soon. According to the Knicks–Pacers rivalry data, the next meeting is scheduled for February 10, 2026 (en.wikipedia.org). Both teams may look here for redemption or extension of momentum.

Key Takeaways and What to Watch

• Brunson remains the Knicks’ go-to closer under pressure. His playoff-caliber production shows no signs of fading.
• The Pacers continue to rely heavily on Nembhard and Siakam. Free-throw efficiency could be a decisive area to monitor.
• Deeper rotations matter—New York’s ball movement through Kolek and Anunoby’s late-game contributions shaped the outcome.
• Season-wide, the Knicks maintain stronger offensive tools, but close games like this highlight the Pacers’ tenacity.

Games this tight often signal larger strategic narratives: how bench depth, timely defense, and clutch scoring define success. Fans and analysts will watch whether the Pacers adjust their late-game process, and whether Knicks can sustain this polished, across-the-board execution.